Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Stubbs v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00432
Plaintiff:
Brady D Stubbs
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HARRIS v. POOLE et al
as 1:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
DERWIN GERRARD HARRIS
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, STUBBS, GREWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11 et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Clay Stubbs, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Stella W. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Larry Stubbs v. Brad Perritt
as 18-6356
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY CONNELL STUBBS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent
Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
as 18-6285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK L. PERRY, BEVERLY STUBBS, RN, DR. SAMI HASSAN and others
Defendant:
DR. CHARLES STEWART, PETER B. WOGLOM, DR ARTHUR DAVIS and others
Stubbs v. Wolfe
as 8:2017cv03555
Petitioner:
Andre Stubbs
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
as 17-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK L. PERRY, BEVERLY STUBBS, R. N., DR. ARTHUR DAVIS and others
Pigett v. Stokes et al
as 5:2017cv01489
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Pigett
Defendant:
Ms Stokes, Ms Stukes, Ms Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02645
Plaintiff:
Cornelia A. Blair and Ronald M. Stubbs
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrell v. Eagleton et al
as 4:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
Jamarriel Ferrell
Defendant:
Willie Eagleton, A.W. Annie Sellars, Michael McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
