Cases 81 - 90 of 1,087
Barney Dunlap v. David Mitchell
as 23-6700
Petitioner / Appellant:
BARNEY ADRIAN DUNLAP
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution
Franklin v. Ridge
as 7:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
Superintendent Luck Ridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darnell Bouie v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6585
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARNELL CARLTON BOUIE
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
Bowers v. Hoag et al
as 7:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Bowers
Defendant:
Superintendant Hoag, MJR O'dell and Lisa Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin Scott v. Lisa Crowder
as 23-6550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN GENE SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA CROWDER, Nurse
Defendant:
MARK MOREL, Sergeant, HARVEN A. CROUSE DETENTION CENTER, BILL BEAM, Superintendent/Sheriff and others
Marcus-El v. Candelario et al
as 5:2023ct03173
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earmon Marcus-El
Defendant:
Lt. James H. Candelario, Asst. Superintendent Locklear, Victor Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey Tyler v. Pamela Locklear
as 23-6528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
ASST. SUPERINTENDENT PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR
McMann v. Greene et al
as 5:2023ct03164
Plaintiff:
Neal McMann
Defendant:
Wakenda Greene, Mrs. Martinez, Stephen Eddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffitt v. Wellpath et al
as 7:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Proffitt
Defendant:
WVRJ, Wellpath, Correct Care LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omari Mason v. Kevin Talley
as 23-6483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMARI KEISAUN MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN TALLEY, Lieutenant, MAJOR FRANK MACK, LARRY LEABOUGH, Superintendent and others
Defendant:
MCKELVIN #81, Sergeant and JONES, Regular Correctional Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
