Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli, Unknown Mims, Unknown McNear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Dante Dixon
Respondent:
S. Lovett, P. Boch, K. Bigart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Dwight Williams
Respondent:
S. Lovett, K. Bigart, W. Sines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
El-Amin v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Sundiata El-Amin
Respondent:
S. Lovett, K. Bigart, P. Boch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Charles Head v. Asst. Warden Sample
as 21-7434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSISTANT WARDEN SAMPLE, WARDEN J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH, Sis Officer and others
Aurel v. Hoover et al
as 1:2020cv02349
Defendant:
Nikki Wilson, Mike Klepitch, Getache Asresahegn and others
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aurel v. Hoover, NPLP et al
as 1:2020cv01339
Defendant:
Janice Robinson, R.N., Wendy Orosco, CMA, Linae Llewellyn, LPN and others
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Gambino v. Frank Hershberger
as 20-6591
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM GERA, JANE DOE, Assistant Warden, 8 JOHN DOE OFFICERS AT FCI CUMBERLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Chappell v. Lieutenant R. Rakowski et al
as 8:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
William Chappell
Defendant:
P. Boch and Lieutenant R. Rakowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tucker Jones v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv03208
Defendant:
Mr. Huff, B. Weaver, K. hansrote and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Tucker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
