Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Elliott v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff: James E Elliott and James Edward Elliott
Defendant: John Crane, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Inc., Albany International Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
William Brock v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1298
Defendant: GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., f/k/a Aqua-Chem, Inc., d/b/a Cleaver-Brooks Division, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE Y. BROCK and WILLIAM L. BROCK
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a/k/a BF Sturtevant, a Delaware Corporation and COVIL CORPORATION
Intervenor Defendant: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Theron Vinson v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1297
Defendant: COVIL CORPORATION, ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THERON T. VINSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Kerry D. Vinson and LINDA G. VINSON
Dorothy Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1391
Defendant: THE RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith
Defendant / Appellee: SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC and FARMERS CHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, INC.
Gehant v. Crane Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00381
Defendant: Ingersoll Rand Company, CBS Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jerome J. Gehant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sharon Whitehead v. Aurora Pump Company
as 20-1676
Defendant / Appellee: FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, Wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Compnay, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant: UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, STERLING FLUID SYSTEMS USA LLC, f/k/a Peerless Pumps Co., MCNALLY INDUSTRIES, INC., successor-in-interest to NORTHERN FIRE APPARATUS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHARON K. WHITEHEAD, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of JAMES T. WHITEHEAD, Deceased
Jeffrey Rockman v. Union Carbide Corporation
as 17-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY ROCKMAN and SONJA ROCKMAN
Defendant - Appellee: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. and GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Co. and others
Erik Phillips v. Pneumo Abex, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIK ROSS PHILLIPS and TINA LANDERS, spouse
Plaintiff: GINA PHILLIPS, spouse
Defendant - Appellee: PNEUMO ABEX, LLC, a/k/a Abex Corporation, f/k/a American Brake Shoe Company, f/k/a American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, American Brakeblok Division and REDDAWAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ASTENJOHNSON, INC., B E & K INC. and others
Joyce Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2248
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOYCE BARLOW
Defendant - Appellant: COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Clara Mosko v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2252
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARA G. MOSKO
Defendant - Appellant: COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?