Cases 1 - 10 of 43
James v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Stanley D.C. Akar James, Jr. and Stanley James D.C. Akar, Jr.
Defendant:
Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Dr. Thomas Pandoum, Sheriff Kristin R. Graziano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Blake v. Terry et al
as 4:2023cv03402
Plaintiff:
William Roscoe Blake, Jr.
Defendant:
Major Terry and Dr. Thomas Byrne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McCoy v. Kanawha County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Chelena J. McCoy
Defendant:
Kanawha County Board of Education and Dr. Thomas F. Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Theodore Powell v. Ralph Northam
as 20-1681
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. VANN WILSON, DR. KURT SMITH, WENDY BOLT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE E. POWELL
Powell v. Northam et al
as 4:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Dr. Dubois, Dr. Kurt Smith, Wendy Bolt and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore E. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mwabira-Simera v. Mercy Medical Center et al
as 1:2019cv03039
Defendant:
Dr. Clayton Dean, Mercy Medical Center and Dr. Thomas R. Mullen
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatfield v. Reed
as 1:2019cv00539
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas Reed
Plaintiff:
Stephen Westley Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
