Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McCormack v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lindsay A. McCormack
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCormack v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11122
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Shirley McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kamper et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10494
Plaintiff:
Donna McCormack Kamper and Kevin Kamper
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07316
Plaintiff:
Beth McCormack
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02176
Plaintiff:
MaryJane McCormack
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07932
Plaintiff:
Stephanie McCormack
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Makar et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25377
Plaintiff:
Vivian Makar , Graciela Martinez , Teresa Sellinger and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv25081
Plaintiff:
Linda D. McCormack and Jackie L. McCormack
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22703
Plaintiff:
Maryjane McCormack
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormack et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04895
Plaintiff:
Carol A. McCormack and Billy McCormack
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
