Cases 1 - 10 of 773
Lozada v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02171
Petitioner:
Luis Angel Lozada
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Malik v. Medical Personel et al
as 5:2024ct03227
Defendant:
N.P. Ontiera, P.A. Tolson, Kimberly Grande and others
Plaintiff:
Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah Malik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez Canela v. Warden FCI Butner Low
as 5:2024hc02161
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Alberto Hernandez Canela
Respondent:
Warden FCI Butner Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tucker v. Diggs
as 5:2024hc02159
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Diggs
Petitioner:
Darryl Leonard Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blakney v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2024ct03209
Plaintiff:
Larry Blakney
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Lott, Warden T. Scarantino, S.I.S. Officer Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ford v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02155
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Petitioner:
Edward E. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alvarez-Zarzgoza v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02154
Respondent:
Warden Heckard
Petitioner:
Bernardo Alvarez-Zarzgoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02152
Petitioner:
Leon Dale Green
Respondent:
Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clemons v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02148
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Petitioner:
Ben Unza Clemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simon v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2024ct03201
Defendant:
Physician Assistant Lane, Warden Thomas Scarantino, Dr. Osole and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
