Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Kerwin Woodard v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 19-40178
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY J. SANCHEZ, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Executive Director, I. AROVEHUN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KERWIN WOODARD
USA v. Demetrice Hodges
as 19-40083
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMETRICE HODGES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Wilson v. City of Meridian Police Dept., et al
as 18-60534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER CORP. UNKNOWN WILLIAMS, DESK OFFICER and others
Vartaurse Penns v. Greene Cty Regn Corrtl Facil, et al
as 18-60391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VARTAURSE CORNELIOUS PENNS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM JORDAN, LESLIE HODGES, MICHAEL BLACKWOOD and others
USA v. Robert Hodges
as 18-10298
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE HODGES
USA v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp., et al
as 17-20720
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant:
ALLIED HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ALLIED HOME MORTGAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, JIM C. HODGE and others
Gallon Hodges v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 17-20643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GALLON WAYNE HODGES
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WARDEN OHARA, WARDEN PRESTWOOD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-20403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Campbell v. Angela Brown, et al
as 17-60248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA BROWN, Nurse Practitioner, EARNEST LEE, Superintendent, MR. PAIGE, Officer and others
USA v. Cecile Cole
as 17-40220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CECILE COLE, also known as Cecile Hodges, also known as Ci Ci
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
