Cases 71 - 80 of 220
Williams v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
Donald Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Jackie Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
Steven Charles Garrett
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Jackie Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2009cv00086
Petitioner:
Moises Sandoval Mendoza
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Dir of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ex Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Capital)
Duesler v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00466
Plaintiff:
Robert Duesler
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Jackie Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swinford v. Quarterman
as 9:2009cv00096
Petitioner:
Marney Andrew Swinford
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nard v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00263
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl. Nard
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burns v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00079
Petitioner:
Ronald Burns
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00246
Petitioner:
Richard Shawn Henderson
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2009cv00441
Petitioner:
Roy Knight
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman, J Edwards, L Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackmon v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
Darrell Blackmon
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Record Department of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
