Cases 1 - 10 of 261
Vineyard v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Jay Vineyard
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00109
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00862
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aleman, Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00819
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Arturo Aleman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Luther Dewayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
