Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Lal Bhatia v. Eric Holder, et al
as 14-60899
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons and VANCE LAUGHLIN, Warden, Adams County Correctional Center, Natchez, Mississippi
Gonzales v. Holder et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carlos Andres Gonzales
Defendant:
Eric Holder , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. , Vance Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Livingston v. Laughlin
as 5:2013cv00124
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin
Plaintiff:
Donovan Anthony Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bhatia v. Holder et al
as 5:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mota v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mota v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mota v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mota v. Laughlin
as 5:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos Giraldo v. Vance Laughlin
as 12-60445
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO GIRALDO
Respondent - Appellee:
VANCE LAUGHLIN, Warden
Orozco v. Laughlin
as 5:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Hector Contrera Orozco
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.