Cases 61 - 70 of 475
Jones v. Gibson et al
as 3:2021cv00652
Plaintiff:
Cordarrel Jones
Defendant:
M.D. Gibson and M.D. Bonner
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugas v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2021cv00530
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermain Dugas
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy, Carl Smith, Kendrick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves v. Moulds et al
as 2:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Wilson Earl Graves, III
Defendant:
Jamie Moulds, Jeff Monk, Vince Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinegal v. Gibson et al
as 6:2021cv01849
Defendant:
Andrea Jones, Medical Staff Correct Health, K P Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Sinegal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gooden et al
as 3:2021cv00372
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones
Defendant:
Charles Gooden and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kolb v. Bickham et al
as 2:2021cv01194
Defendant:
Johnny Hill, Derek Mingo, Unidentified Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Leslie-David Kolb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearing v. Wilkinson County Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Defendant:
Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, Law Librarian Rosemary Gatlin, United States Postmaster and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bowie et al
as 1:2021cv01329
Plaintiff:
Lee Rondell Jones
Defendant:
Chris McConnell, C / O Bowie, Ms Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Ezell et al
as 1:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tyler D. Jones
Defendant:
Tyrone Nelson and Mike Ezell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Judge Chris Craft, Attorney James Jones, District Attorney Amy Weirich and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
