Cases 31 - 40 of 46
IHG Healthcare, Inc. v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 10-20531
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IHG HEALTHCARE, INC., doing business as Grace Hospice of Texas and GRACE HOSPICE OF TEXAS, doing business as Grace Hospice of Texas
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services
Heart to Heart Hospice of Tyler, Ltd. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
Heart to Heart Hospice of Tyler, Ltd.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Harris Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Harris Hospice, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Maxxim Care EMS, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv01408
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
Maxxim Care EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lion Health Services, Inc. v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 10-10414
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LION HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, doing business as Lion Hospice, a Texas Corportation
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Health and Human Services
Kingsland Hospital, LP et al v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv01055
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
Kingsland Hospital, LP and St. Michael's Hospital & Healthcare Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Udeobong v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00535
Plaintiff:
Ita Udeobong dba Midland Care Medical Supply
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anselmo v. Sebelius
as 1:2009cv00995
Plaintiff:
Charles Anselmo
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 a Recovery of civil monetary penalty & assessment
Cleveland Regional Medical Center v. Sebelius
as 1:2009cv00960
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Regional Medical Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Vermilion Behavioral Health Center v. Sebelius
as 6:2009cv01884
Plaintiff:
Vermilion Behavioral Health Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
