Cases 41 - 50 of 260
Romero Perez et al v. 665 9th Ave. Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv08294
Defendant:
John Panorios, Elias Neofotistos, Juan Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Hernandez Parra, Javier Mora Peralta, Gilberto Pazaran Cristobal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anastacio Medina v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 2:2020cv08115
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Medina
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Anastacio Medina v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as CAC/2:20-CV-08115
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Medina
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
YABES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78463
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANASTACIO YABES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rene Lacayo-Miranda v. William Barr
as 20-72233
Petitioner:
RENE ANASTACIO LACAYO-MIRANDA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
ROSADO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60727
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANASTACIO ROSADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LARA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52097
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANASTACIO LARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Anastacio Benavides-Vasquez
as 20-50525
Defendant / Appellant:
ANASTACIO BENAVIDES-VASQUEZ, Anastacio Benavidez-Vasquez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Anastacio Benavidez-Vazquez
as 20-50510
Defendant / Appellant:
ANASTACIO BENAVIDEZ-VAZQUEZ, also known as Anastacio Benavides-Vazquez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cantero-Bolanos v. USA
as 5:2020cv00278
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anastacio Cantero-Bolanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
