Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 4.65 acres of land, more or less, in Panola County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Michael S. MacInnis, United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Dennis Welch and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.78 acres of land, more or less, ini Panola County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.78 acres of land, more or less, ini Panola County, Mississippi, Lea Anderson Garrott , Suzanne S. Garrott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
USA v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.01 acres of Land, More or Less, in Panola County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.01 acres of Land, More or Less, in Panola County, Mississippi and Henry E. Heafner
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
USA v. Tree-Removal Rights with respect to land in Panola County, Mississippi, and Hunters Trace Development Corporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights with respect to land in Panola County, Mississippi, and Hunters Trace Development Corporation, Inc. and BancorpSouth Bank
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
USA v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.09 Acre of Land, more or less, in Panola County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.09 Acre of Land, more or less, in Panola County, Mississippi and Bobby Joe Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
