Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Shelton, et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2012cv01227
Plaintiff:
Gary Shelton , Franklin D Belz , Terry L Boley and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Deaver v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2012cv00302
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Jerry Deaver
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Edwards et al v. Port Terminal Railroad Association et al
as 4:2012cv00569
Plaintiff:
L.B. Edwards, Jr. and James A. Smith
Defendant:
Port Terminal Railroad Association, Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
National Railroad Psngr Corp. v. Selby Clay
as 11-31040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN V. PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP and BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Stanley v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Greg Stanley
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Anderson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniel Anderson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grimes v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Grimes
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Nagra v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) et al
as 6:2010cv01331
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Transport, Inc. , MCMC, L.L.C. , National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jonette D. Nagra
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Goodson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2009cv07632
Plaintiff:
Michael Goodson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Harvey v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
Victor Harvey
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
