Cases 91 - 100 of 245
Roe v. Smith County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2018cv00212
Defendant:
Smith County, Mississippi, Keith Stringer, Charlie Crumpton and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00832
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Clay County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rachel Harris
Defendant:
Forrest Allgood, Honorable Lee Howard, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deroche v. Hancock County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
Shaylynn Deroche
Defendant:
Hancock County, Mississippi , Hancock Medical Center and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00326
Plaintiff:
Reginald Butler and Jacobs Johnson
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Tyrone Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonnie Thomas v. State of Texas, et al
as 18-10448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BONNIE ALLEN THOMAS, formerly known as Bonnie Allen-Pieroni
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, JOHNSON COUNTY, TEXAS, BOB ALFORD and others
Yaotonalcuauhtlo et al v. Short et al
as 1:2018cv00214
Plaintiff:
Emiliano Guajardo, Ana Maurine Lara, Mandy Peyrani and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Christopher Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
