Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Torres v. Goldstein et al
as 3:2024cv01843
Defendant:
Dennise Garcia, Robert D Burns, Ken Molberg and others
Plaintiff:
Ruth Torres
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Scott v. Lieutenant Wasko #4557 et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Defendant:
Victoria Danene Brown, Hays County Sheriff Gary Cutler, Judicial Officer Joe R. Pool and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thompson v. City of Van et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mary . Thompson
Defendant:
city of van, Tammy Huff, Melissa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning et al v. Filler
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
John W. Manning and Brandi Burns
Defendant:
Frank Filler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
