Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nixon v. Chester et al
as 2:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Latoya Nixon
Defendant:
Vera Chester, Latoya Edwards-Williams and Daniel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Baucom
as 22-50066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie Lee Wilson and Chester Jackson, Sr., as next friend Chester Jackson, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Riley Baucom, Deputy John K. Bennett and Burleson County
Wilson et al v. Baucom et al
as 1:2020cv00311
Defendant:
Robert Riley Baucom, Deputy John K. Bennett, City of Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Wilson and Chester Jackson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bridgewater et al v. Bergeron et al
as 2:2019cv12656
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Watson, Jr. and Erica Bridgewater
Defendant:
Officer Edwin Bergeron, City of Hammond, Officer Chester Leander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Keliher et al
as 3:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Terri Moore, Craig Watkins, PBL Multi-Strategy Fund LP and others
Plaintiff:
Albert G Hill, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Keliher et al
as 4:2019cv02528
Defendant:
Terri Moore, Craig Watkins, PBL Multi-Strategy Fund LP and others
Plaintiff:
Albert G Hill, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fernandez v. Austin et al
as 2:2018cv00948
Plaintiff:
Mark A Fernandez, III
Defendant:
City of Leesville and Chester Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owensby v. Austin et al
as 2:2018cv00949
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Owensby
Defendant:
City of Leesville and Chester Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Vincent v. City of Sulphur, et al
as 17-30056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL J. VINCENT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SULPHUR, LEWIS COATS, CHESTER GREMILLION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
