Cases 21 - 30 of 1,543
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Neri v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01378
Petitioner:
Jaime Rodriguez Neri
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Defendant:
Michael Bloch, Melissa Williams, Daniel Sarabia, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00074
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
County v. U.S. Judge Fred Biery et al
as 4:2024cv01972
Defendant:
Jamie Hurndon, U.S. Xavier Rodriguez, U.S. Judge Fred Biery and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Denise County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olvera-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00069
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Olvera-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bonner v. West et al
as 5:2024cv00531
Defendant:
John West, Officer FNU Worth, Sgt. FNU Lerma and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50392
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Joe Corley Detention Facility
as 4:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
Saul Sanchez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joe Corley Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
