Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Searcy v. Office of Attorney General - Child Support Division et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Interactive Services, Ralph Willis, Casa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galyeon v. Texas Department of Child and Family Protective Services et al
as 6:2021cv00189
Petitioner:
Milisa Foster Galyeon
Respondent:
Texas Department of Child and Family Protective Services and Christin H Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Vela v. Child Support Office et al
as 4:2021cv01402
Defendant:
Attorney General and Child Support Office
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Marcos Vela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batz v. Child Protective Services et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Jefferson County Sheriff Dept and Jefferson County Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Edgar Batz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Texas Department of Family Child Protective Services et al
as 5:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family Child Protective Services, San Antonio Police Department, Daniel Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray Roberts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. Cutright
as 1:2020cv00560
Defendant:
FNU Cutright
Plaintiff:
Jason Childs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Child Protective Services
as 2:2020cv00219
Plaintiff:
Georgio Rodriquez Scott
Defendant:
Child Protective Services
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Beaumont Low
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Childs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01218
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Texas Department of Child Protective Services
as 5:2020cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jammie L. Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Child Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
