Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Bell v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Charles Sylvester Bell
Defendant:
Richard McKenzie, Glen White, Boyce Hollerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crossley v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Desmond Derrell Crossley
Defendant:
Bradley McKenzie and Walthall Co. Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Larry McKenzie
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, MDOC Records Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Hood
as 3:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
Larry W. McKenzie
Defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glenn v. Lockhart et al
as 6:2014cv00426
Defendant:
Officer M. Alston, Warden Bruce Armstrong, Capt. of Corrections R. Harvey and others
Plaintiff:
Larenzo Berlin Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. USA
as 5:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McKenzie
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McKenzie v. Mohr et al
as 4:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward McKenzie
Defendant:
David Mohr, Robert Dryen, Peggy Supak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Berger et al
as 4:2013cv01488
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward McKenzie
Defendant:
Andrew Berger, James Lowan, Peggy Supak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Union Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Frank Antonio McKenzie
Defendant:
Union Parish Detention Center and Medical Staff Union Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2012cv03054
Plaintiff:
Kirk McKenzie
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, John Tofton, Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
