Cases 31 - 40 of 406
Busby v. Baker et al
as 4:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Baker and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Busby v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Jerry J Sanchez, Placido Samaniego, Jr., Juan J Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Busby v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bryan L. Williams, Dr Kevin B Smith, Anthony J Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle, et al.
as 5:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Lowell Q. Green
Defendant:
Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farley v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Farley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edwards v. Gusa
as 6:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Edwards
Defendant:
Lenn Gusa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierre v. Texas Comal County et al
as 5:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pierre
Defendant:
Texas Comal County, Texas Comal County Sheriff Dept., Officer FNU Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
