Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02779
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alonzo et al v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alonzo, Jaun Frausto, Bairo Cardona Perez and others
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01765
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2021cv00984
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Texas, DA Joe Gonzalez, Javier Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Gonzalez
as 4:2020cv04108
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Hernandez
Defendant:
Ricardo N Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Randy
as 4:2019cv03798
Defendant:
Judge Randy Roll
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez et al v. McCaig et al
as 4:2019cv01572
Defendant:
Lee Van Richardson, Jr, Defense Atty Zachary Coufal, Judge Albert McCaig and others
Plaintiff:
Juan-Carlos Hernandez, Dontae-Rashun Smith, Jose-Leonel Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Carlos Hernandez
as 16-51442
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ
USA v. Carlos Hernandez
as 16-51388
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
