Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Jones v. Kroger et al
as 4:2024cv03264
Plaintiff:
Leon D. Jones
Defendant:
Kroger and Baytown Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kroger's et al
as 4:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Leonard D Jones
Defendant:
Baytown Police Dept. and Kroger's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Strong
as 24-20245
Plaintiff:
Sean D. Jones
Defendant:
Victoria C. Dorimics, Suzzane V. Temorio, Medical Provider, Carla D. Teal and others
Jones v. East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge and Corey Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden Strong et al
as 4:2023cv04471
Plaintiff:
Sean D Jones
Defendant:
Warden Strong, Suzzane V. Temorio, Victoria C. Dorimics and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. East Baton Rouge et al
as 6:2023cv01537
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones, Jr
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge and Corey Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. West Baton Rouge
as 3:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
West Baton Rouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Unknown Medical Administration et al
as 5:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
James D. Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Administration and Administration of Hays County Sheriff Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Coffin et al
as 1:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ortiz
Defendant:
Warden Coffin, Donna Russell, D Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Officer D. Wright, et al.
as 1:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
James D. Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Administration, Administration of Hays County Sheriff Gary Cutler, Officer D Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
