Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Raymond Detention Center
as 3:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey and Richard Conrad Johnson
Defendant:
Raymond Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker et al v. Walker et al
as 6:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
Samantha R Walker and Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
Christina Vaughn, Renee Walker and CPS Huntsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Franco et al
as 7:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Michael E Rutledge, Warden A Franco and TDCJ Executive Director
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Seagoville Police Department
as 3:2019cv02588
Defendant:
Seagoville Police Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Johnson
Interested Party:
Chief Ray Calverley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 9:2019cv00118
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 6:2019cv00413
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-11081
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD J. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Johnson v. Angelina County D.A. Office et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Angelina County D.A., Court of Criminal Appeals, Angelina County Defense Attorney Winfred III and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
