Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Burgdorf v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 5:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
Brian W. Burgdorf
Defendant:
Daniel Torres and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Agee v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2016cv01740
Plaintiff:
Steve Agee
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doucet v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2016cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Doucet
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Brian Mcgavock, John Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Ibarra v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 5:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Carmen Ibarra
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad and Railcrew Express LLC
Receiver:
CT Corporation Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ruiz v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 3:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Hector Ruiz
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Lynch v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv02701
Plaintiff:
Richard Lynch
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Winston v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2013cv00471
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Steve B. Winston, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Musachia v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2013cv01163
Plaintiff:
Joseph Musachia
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Davis v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 5:2012cv02738
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Davis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Gomez v. Public Law Board 6719 et al
as 3:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
James A. Gomez
Defendant:
Public Law Board 6719 and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
