Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2019cv09537
Defendant:
Thomas J. Cortazzo, Sidney H Cates, IV, Debra Dave and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cates v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08705
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cates v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and Accord Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv17121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2017cv12195
Defendant:
Sidney H Cates, IV , Debra Dave, Dwight A. Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cate v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08466
Plaintiff:
Jack N. Cate
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2017cv04786
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Defendant:
Sidney H Cates, IV, Baldwin, Haspel, Burke & Mayer, LLC, Thomas J. Cortazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00066
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cates Brooks
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Brooks v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 2:2017mc00066
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cates Brooks
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Cormier et al v. Soroa et al
as 6:2016cv01438
Defendant:
Ubaldo Soroa, Hawk Logistics, S O L Express Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Cormier and Byron Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
