Cases 31 - 40 of 858
All Class and Direct Action Plaintiffs v. Shafer
as 4:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
All Class and Direct Action Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Bradley Shafer
Pelley v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al.
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Jacob Pelley, As Trustee of the Bradley Pierce Brown Trust and Jacob Pelley
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Paula Johnson-Muic, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Zurovetz v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Zurovetz and Todd Micheal Zurovetz
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Beverly Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY et al v. Rusk County, Texas
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
JAYME BRADLEY and DANIEL BRADLEY
Defendant:
Rusk County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bates v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Bradley Bates
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Headley v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 5:2023cv01277
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jon Burton Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Searcy v. Mr. Macintire et al
as 4:2023cv03731
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Mr. Macintire and Mr. Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shumway v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03645
Petitioner:
Bradley Jacobs Shumway
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Interested Party:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Searcy v. Castillo et al
as 4:2023cv03647
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcey and Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Officer Castillo and Officer Chany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
