Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Speed et al v. Gautreaux
as 3:2018cv01024
Plaintiff:
Wyndette Williams, Joe Ducre and Alicia Speed
Defendant:
Sid Gautreaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Speed et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2018cv00528
Plaintiff:
Charles Speed and Tandra Speed
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terry Speed v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-10491
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY GLYNN SPEED
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ross v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv14073
Plaintiff:
Wilhelmina Ross and Speed Ross
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Speed, et al v. Gautreaux, et al
as 2:2017cv12622
Plaintiff:
Alicia Speed and Joe Ducre
Defendant:
Sid J. Gautreaux and Wydette Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speed v. The Kroger Company
as 3:2017cv02578
Plaintiff:
Edith Speed
Defendant:
The Kroger Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Speed et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03169
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Howard L Speed and Gwendolyn M Speed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strange v. Speed et al
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Strange
Defendant:
George Speed and Purchasing & Parts Solution Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Speed v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01952
Petitioner:
Terry Glynn Speed
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
