Cases 71 - 80 of 765
Woods v. US Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2021cv00791
Defendant:
GEO Transport and US Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Kermit C Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 5:2021cv00177
Defendant:
Dr. Ghazwan M. Kroma, University Hospital, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Tremont D. Williams
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00021
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., GEO Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00017
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., Geo Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lacey v. GEO Group
as 21-60080
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden V. Horton, Warden R. Gillespie and GEO Group, Incorporated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Lacey
Aguilar-Hernandez v. Cole et al
as 4:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Wellpath, Warden D.C. Cole and GEO Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Aguilar-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanza 360 LLC v. GEOS Worldwide, Ltd.
as 4:2021cv00040
Defendant:
GEOS Worldwide, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Lanza 360 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nel v. Cole
as 20-50939
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Tarasas, Correctional Officer, FNU Madrill, Special Intelligent Session, P. Wise and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jan Abraham Nel
Rodriguez-Zubia v. GEO Del Rio, Texas et al
as 2:2020cv00067
Defendant:
GEO Winton, North Carolina, GEO Del Rio, Texas and Limestone County Detention Center, Groesbeck, Texas
Plaintiff:
Erasmo Guadalupe Rodriguez-Zubia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00427
Defendant:
FNU Anderson, B Connelly, FNU Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald I Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
