Cases 1 - 10 of 42
White v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00109
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00862
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Lusk, et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Defendant:
Anthony Scott White, Michael Lusk, Bart Craytor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Unknown et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Unknown and Captain Unknown Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Unknown et al
as 6:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott White
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Unknown and Captain Unknown Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Anthony Scott Law Firm
as 23-10517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Jarrod Payne
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Scott Law Firm, P.L.L.C., also known as Brendetta Anthony Scott, Stacy Eley Payne, co-conspirator and Stacey G. Jernigan
Payne v. The Anthony Scott Law Firm PLLC et al
as 3:2022cv02926
Defendant:
The Anthony Scott Law Firm PLLC, Brendetta Anthony Scott and Stacy Eley Payne
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jarrod Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv01005
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Johnson
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
