Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
David Cook v. Prudential Insurance Company o We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3364
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID I. COOK
Defendant - Appellee: PRUDENTIAL IINSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Pace Industry Union-Management, et al v. Dannex Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6545
Plaintiff - Appellee: PACE INDUSTRY UNION-MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND, and its Trustees, BOYD YOUNG, DONALD L. LANGHAM and others
Defendant - Appellant: DANNEX MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ANNEX MANUFACTURING and ALAN FUNK
Moses Moore, et al v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al
as 08-4553
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: MOSES MOORE, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, ROSS J. SATTERFIELD, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, BART J. KOCHIS, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: JAMES HALL, JR., on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and WILLIAM WANDRYCH, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and MORTON RETIRED EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE PLAN
Defendant - Appellee: DOES 1-20
Moses Moore, et al v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al
as 08-4545
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: MOSES MOORE, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, ROSS J. SATTERFIELD, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, BART J. KOCHIS, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES HALL, JR., on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated and WILLIAM WANDRYCH, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and MORTON RETIRED EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE PLAN
Defendant: DOES 1-20

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?