Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Charles Kendrick v. William Daniel, et al
as 15-1381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES KENDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM B. DANIEL, PETER JON VON HOEK, KYM L. WORTHY and others
Arthur Campbell v. The City of Detroit, et al
as 15-1208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF DETROIT, WAYNE COUNTY, JAMES W. FINCH and others
Defendant:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Reo Bryant, et al v. Harrell Smith, et al
as 14-2570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REO BRYANT, aka Reo Markeece Bryant, LARRY STOVALL, aka Larry Whiddill McNeal Stovall and ANTHONY LAVELLE MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL SMITH, Grand Rapids Police Department Detective, HELEN BRINKMAN, Kent County Prosecutor, FRITZ HEARTLEY, 61st District Court Judge and others
Peter Mayo v. USA
as 14-5764
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER MAYO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peter Manna v. Joe Coakley, et al
as 14-3394
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER MANNA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE COAKLEY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Teddy McKenzie, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEDDY EUGENE MCKENZIE, DAVID W. SMITH, MATTHEW PETER ONON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL HEYNS, DENNIS STRAUB, Warden and others
Matthew Onon v. Jeffrey Wood
as 13-2423
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW PETER ONON, aka Matthew Peter O'Non
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
USA v. Peter Lukasavitz
as 13-1661
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER LUKASAVITZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peter Hendrickson v. USA
as 13-1630
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER E. HENDRICKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peter Thomson v. Alfred Jones, et al
as 13-1550
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER THOMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFRED JONES, Administrative Assistant Southern Region Health Care Services, BRYAN DEEREN, RN - 13, JODY LEBARRE, RN H.U.M. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
