Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Dwayne Davis v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DAVIS, aka Dwayne Davis-El
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, in their personal capacity, LES PARISH, Warden, in their personal capacity, THOMAS P. MACKIE, Former Warden, in their personal capacity and others
Majid Alzid v. Gizelle Porter, et al
as 23-2098
Plaintiff:
MAJID ALZID, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher Morgan
Defendant:
GIZELLE PORTER, individual capacity only, JEFFERY STOKES, individual capacity only, SCOTT CORRION, individual capacity only and others
Xavier Porter v. USA
as 22-6125
Petitioner / Appellant:
XAVIER DEMETRIUS PORTER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brian Alford v. Robert Zilles, et al
as 22-3416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT ZILLES, [UNKNOWN] BARKER, CANDY BABB and others
Demerrick Ratliff v. Shelby County, TN, et al
as 22-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMERRICK RATLIFF, fka Demerrick Javon Porter
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN and FLOYD BONNER, JR., Individually and in his official capacity
Carlton Porter v. USA
as 17-1559
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLTON DESHAWN PORTER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Howard Fisher v. James Holloway, et al
as 17-5516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD PORTER FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. HOLLOWAY, Warden, DICKENSON, Warden and DR. COX
Jerome McDougald v. Esham, et al
as 17-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME MCDOUGALD
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ESHAM, LIEUTENANT JOSEPH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER QUEEN and others
Yale Balcar v. Aaron Smith, et al
as 17-5113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON SMITH, Kentucky State Reformatory Warden, LT. DEANNA HAWKINS, SERGEANT KELLEY and others
India Porter v. Anthony Stewart
as 15-1979
Petitioner / Appellant:
INDIA PORTER
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTHONY STEWART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
