Cases 1 - 10 of 211
USA v. Nathan Lucas
as 24-5628
Defendant:
NATHAN LUCAS, Doctor of Podiatric Medicine (DPM)
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Chapman, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
CLAY KINCHELOE, TERRI EGLEBERRY, Successor of the Deceased, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE and others
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Karri Stevens, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 24-1494
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, ALBERT BOURLA, Pfizer Official, THE MAPLES, Healthcare Facility and others
Plaintiff:
CORRINA D. COOPER and KARRI L. STEVENS
Nathan Roberts, et al v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, et al
as 24-3454
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM TRUCK DISPATCH, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and NATHAN ROBERTS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CIRCULAR BOARD INC., originally named as Circular Board, LLC and PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Rafael Bean v. Nathan Hoffman
as 24-1220
Petitioner:
RAFAEL VERNIER BEAN
Respondent:
NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Warden
Horace Crump v. Jane Blue, et al
as 24-1126
Plaintiff:
HORACE W. CRUMP
Defendant:
JANE BLUE, LCF Nurse, in their personal capacity, NATHAN MIKEL, LCF Health Unit Manager (HUM), in their personal capacity, TIMOTHY SHAW, LCF Resident Unit Manager (RUM), in their personal capacity and others
Nathan Ling v. Campbell County, TN, et al
as 24-5051
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LING
Defendant:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, TN, et al. and DAKOTA WILLIAMS, in his official and individual capacities
Nathan Jacobs v. Joseph Biden
as 24-1028
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. JACOBS
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States
David Adams v. Regina Kemp, et al
as 23-2091
Plaintiff:
DAVID OMAR ADAMS
Defendant:
REGINA KEMP, Law Library Clerk, personal capacity, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Warden, personal capacity, CHESTER DUMS, Assistant Deputy Warden, personal capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
