Cases 191 - 200 of 841,434
GALLARDO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05079
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
MITZILA GALLARDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fallin v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05084
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fallin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ROGERS v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05094
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROGERS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Castillo v. Lee et al
as 4:2024cv03608
Plaintiff:
Gisselle Castillo
Defendant:
Jordan ONeil Lee and P&S Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Starks, Jr. v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Defendant:
Nehal Shah, Chadwick Dotson, Stephanie Vick and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. City Jail Vegas et al
as 3:2024cv00433
Defendant:
United States, City of Las Vegas, City Jail Vegas and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
The City of Las Vegas, The County of Clark, Clark County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00598
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb #343296 v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv02565
Plaintiff:
Veronika Webb
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
