Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Groulx v. China National Chemical Company, et al
as 1:2024cv11760
Defendant:
Syngenta Korea Limited, Novartis Crop Productions, Syngenta Chemical B.V. and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cobb v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03565
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cobb v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Steven Cobb
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cobb v C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03388
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb v. Kone, Incorporated
as 2:2015cv10899
Plaintiff:
Thresia COBB
Defendant:
KONE Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01049
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Cobb
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobbs v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
Monique Cobbs
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adkins et al v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Terry Adeyemi, Sarah F. Adkins, Barbara J. Ahmad and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare LLC and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Cobb et al v. Combilift USA, LLC, et al
as 3:2009cv01706
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Cobb, Steven A. Cobb, Jeannette K. Mackie and others
Defendant:
Combilift USA, LLC and Rapid Rentals & Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
