Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hutchins #438751 v. Pollack et al
as 1:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Hutchins and Daniel Hutchins #438751
Defendant:
John C. Pollack, Daryl T. Parker and Shauna Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon #814679 v. Kent et al
as 2:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harmon #814679
Defendant:
Unknown Kent and Erica Huss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinder v. Warren County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
John R. Kinder
Defendant:
Warren County Jail, Steven Harmon, Amir Ziga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tudor v. Boyle County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tyler Tudor
Defendant:
Boyle County Fiscal Court , Boyle County Detention Center , Barry Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Harmon et al
as 5:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ridgeway
Defendant:
Barry Harmon, Steve Beshear and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcorn v. Boyle County Detention Center et al
as 5:2011cv00174
Defendant:
Boyle County Detention Center, Barry Harmon, Larry Isham and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Martel Alcorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Branham #154900 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rodney Branham #154900
Defendant:
MDOC, William Smith, Unknown Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Bourne v. Barry Harmon
as 09-5446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK BOURNE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY HARMON, Boyle County Jailer
Bourne v. Harmon et al
as 5:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mark Bourne
Defendant:
Barry Harmon, John Snow, Sue Denham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
