Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Spratling v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Spratling
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Officer Anderson, Sgt Kidds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Coffee et al
as 2:2019cv02774
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F. Miles, IV
Defendant:
Lee V. Coffee, Meghan Fowler, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Batts et al
as 2:2018cv02818
Defendant:
F/N/U Jacobs, Ann Simon, Victoria Buzzanga and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Derrick Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Borden et al
as 1:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Arthor Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
John Borden and Core Civic Correction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. T.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2017cv02181
Plaintiff:
Octavious Walton
Defendant:
T.D.O.C., West-High Unit 6 Team, James Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banes v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv01003
Plaintiff:
Tyler Banes
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Tony Parks, Jimmy Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Draves v. Hankins et al
as 2:2015cv00313
Plaintiff:
Dale W Draves
Defendant:
Pat Hankins, Angela Morgan, Roger Willit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague et al v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Charles Montague, Derrick Payne, Christopher Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jesse Gregg, Roger Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Washington County, TN et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Charles A Knight
Defendant:
Washington County, TN, Ed Graybeal, Brenda Downes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
