Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Samassa v. Golden et al
as 2:2024cv02201
Plaintiff:
Djibril H. Samassa
Defendant:
Officer Golden, Officer Taylor, Officer Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle et al v.
as 1:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
Lowell H Kyle, Sr, Colton Drake Clingan, Larry Leland Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilgar v. Carroll County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Andrew H Hilgar
Defendant:
Carroll County, Tennessee, Karl Jackson and Andy Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02292
Plaintiff:
Robert Burnett
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Isiah Hatcher, Mosiah Armstrong, Dakota J Dorton and others
Defendant:
Wayne Anderson, Gregg Simcox, Brenda Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv02658
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Davis
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., John Clark and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Reece et al
as 2:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Robert H Johnson
Defendant:
Mike Reece, Shawn Brown, Billy Joe Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
