Cases 11 - 20 of 317
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Kallmeyer v. Mathews
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kallmeyer
Defendant:
Samuel Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pendleton v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Randy Kennedy, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Andra Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Meigs County Government et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ALEXANDER SMITH
Defendant:
MEIGS COUNTY GOVERNMENT and ROBERT J LEONARD
Intervenor:
Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Madu v. Detroit Public Schools Community District et al
as 2:2023cv12825
Plaintiff:
Chinonye Madu
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools Community District, ANGEL GARCIA, III and CYNTHIA ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
