Cases 11 - 20 of 456
Nutini v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Michele Renee Nutini
Defendant:
City of Covington, C. Bell, Brian Valenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferreiras v. The City of Covington et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ferreiras
Defendant:
The City of Covington, Douglas Ullrich and Anthony Fritsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warick v. Newsome et al
as 7:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gary Warick
Defendant:
Dusty Newsome, Mr. Symshack, John Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toon v. Spann et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steven Glen Toon
Defendant:
Officer Michael Andrew Spann, Officer Jonathan Sholar and The City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Noe v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ian Noe
Defendant:
Jordan Kennedy and City of Russellville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. The City of Louisville Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
The City of Louisville Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrow v. Vanceburg
as 0:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Janet Farrow
Defendant:
City of Vanceburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
