Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Leonard Franks v. State of Arizona, et al
as 13-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD DAVID FRANKS, aka Lenny Franks, aka D. Cutler
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, JANICE BREWER, Governor, THOMAS CHARLES HORN, Arizona Attorney General and others
Dominique A. Morrow v. Stoner, et al
as 5:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
Dominique A Morrow
Defendant:
Tracy D Stoner, Steve Norman, Carol J. Dezso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Adams County Recorder et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Adams County Recorder , Allen County Recorder , Ashland County Recorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Franks v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv10088
Plaintiff:
Leonard David Franks
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Jan Brewer , Thomas Charles Horn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Joy v. Georgia et al
as 2:2012cv12971
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jason Joy
Defendant:
Georgia, Eash, Wesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2012cv12532
Defendant:
Oakland, County of, Oakland County Sheriff Department, Michael J. Bouchard and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv15589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Benson v. Street et al
as 2:2011cv02438
Plaintiff:
Terry Benson
Defendant:
Christopher Street, Michael Bishop, Bobby Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
