Cases 41 - 50 of 717
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. City of Fairfield et al
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Kelly A. Smith
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Stephen Maynard, Scott Timmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Satkowiak v. McLain et al
as 1:2023cv13096
Plaintiff:
Paul Satkowiak
Defendant:
Danielle McLain, Unknown EGLE Agent No. 1, Unknown EGLE Agent No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Agness McCurry v. D. Thomas, Jr., et al
as 23-6053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
D. KELLY THOMAS, JR., Senior Judge, JOSEPH P. AHILLEN, Senior Assistant Attorney General, ROGER A. PAGE, Justice and others
Bowersox v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02287
Plaintiff:
Lacee Bowersox
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Kelly Weaver, Madison Conrad Hogie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sanders v. Wilber et al
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Sanders
Defendant:
James Wilber, Kelli Chapman, Patrick Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
