Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Brock v. City of Inkster et al
as 2:2022cv10500
Plaintiff:
Bradley Brock
Defendant:
City of Inkster, Officer John Doe and Chief of Police William T. Riley III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackmon v. Lenawee County Health Department et al
as 4:2022cv10364
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Blackmon
Defendant:
Lenawee County Health Department, Martha Hall, Blissfield Community Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
D. Savage, LLC et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2021cv11242
Defendant:
Kevin A. Briggs, Matthew J. Bray, Ronald C. Hopp and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Davison, Cotea Jones, Curtis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. City of Inkster et al
as 2:2019cv11593
Defendant:
William Long, City of Inkster, William Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Camille Yvette Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. City of Dearborn et al
as 3:2018cv13156
Defendant:
Vincent Belloli and City of Dearborn
Plaintiff:
Joshua Simpson and Montrell Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lockard et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv13045
Defendant:
Officer Amy Matelic, Arthur Leavells, Sgt. Stephen Geelhood and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lockard and Adam Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
