Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Robert Huddleston v. Wilson Cnty Sheriff's Dept, et al
as 16-6307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. HUDDLESTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TENNESSEE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTE, SWANSON SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Crockett v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2016cv02059
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Defendant:
Kizzy Hawkins, f/n/u Thomas, f/n/u Rycher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Chapman et al
as 3:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Eddie Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Arvil Chapman, Wendy Ashe, Robert Coble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritter v. Thompson et al
as 2:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Preston L. Ritter, Sr.
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Terry Carl, Deputy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Orton et al
as 1:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
Larry Payne
Defendant:
Karen Orton, Nicole Imman, Brandy Keeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Jasper et al
as 1:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Tyris Harvey
Defendant:
f/n/u Jasper, Wendy Ash, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlin Williamson v. John Baxter, et al
as 14-6109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLIN WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BAXTER, Medical Director, WENDY ASHE, ROBERT COBLE, Medical Doctor and others
Williamson v. Baxter et al
as 1:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Marlin Williamson
Defendant:
John Baxter, Wendy Ashe, Robert Coble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ellis
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Damon Hiniger, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Goble et al
as 1:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
Randy Bea Anderson and Ricky Gene Williams
Defendant:
f/n/u Goble, f/n/u Bruster, f/n/u Reddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.