Cases 61 - 70 of 7,587
Tolbert v. Doe et al.
as 1:2024cv01340
Defendant:
Medical Admin. Jane Doe and Doctor John Doe
Plaintiff:
Brandon Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv12013
Petitioner:
Christopher Anthony Long
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dabney #822883 v. Parsons et al
as 1:2024cv00786
Defendant:
Unknown Leggett, Keith Barber, K. Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Javon Dabney #822883
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Correctional Center of Northeast Ohio et al.
as 3:2024cv01310
Defendant:
Dennis Sullivan, fnu Haburn, fnu Springer and others
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lawrence et al v.Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Defendant:
Lee R. Dotson, Tennessee Department of Corrections, First Name Unknown Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
John Keith Lawrence, J Fred Lunsford and Patrick Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCloud v. Garrison et al
as 3:2024cv00920
Defendant:
f/n/u Walker, f/n/u Smith, Nurse Mary and others
Plaintiff:
Little John McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Crane v. Chad Palmiter, et al
as 24-1636
Defendant:
CHAD PALMITER, Undersheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Correctional Officer John Doe, official and personal capacity, ROBERT MENDHAM, Sheriff of Newaygo County Jail, official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDREW CRANE, aka Timothy Andrew Lee Crane
Childs v. Oswald et al
as 2:2024cv11920
Plaintiff:
Austin Raymonds Childs
Defendant:
John Doe, Oswald and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Stinson, Mark v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2024cv02533
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office and John T. Fowlkes
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
