Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Defendant:
John Doe, Reyes, Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau and James Allen Babineau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemmons v. United States District Court Western District of Michigan
as 1:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
Tirrell L. Clemmons
Respondent:
United States District Court Western District of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clemmons #09415-040 v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00338
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Tirrell Lashone Clemmons #09415-040
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clemmons #09415-040 v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00636
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Tirrell Lashone Clemmons #09415-040
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clemmons v. Hardin County et al
as 3:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Antoine Tyrone Clemmons
Defendant:
Hardin County, Hardin County Detention Center, Hardin County Public Defender's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom #228931 v. Christiansen et al
as 1:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Defendant:
Unknown Blair, Unknown Christiansen, Unknown Beaushane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sales v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
Arkmael Ray Sales
Defendant:
Arthur Hale, Mary Lawrence, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Montgomery County/CPD et al
as 3:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Coray E. Knight, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County/CPD, Goble Law Firm, Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Clemmons v. Ernie Moore
as 13-3139
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY CLEMMONS
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
