Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Elijah Ford v. Michael Kennerly, et al
as 17-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH M. FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. KENNERLY, Physician Assistant, ROGER A. GERLACH, Medical Doctor, RICHARD CZOP, Medical Doctor and others
Williams v. Vancamp
as 4:2017cv10637
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams, III, Audrey Arthur, Lawson Love and others
Defendant:
John Vancamp, Timothy Thorland, Richard S. Zeiman and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sharon Brooks, Tiffani Donald, Mia Tate and others
Robert Annabel, II v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 16-2398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, CHRISTOPHER KING, AARON RUTGERS and others
King v. USA
as 2:2016cv12272
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Daron Christopher King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Annabel #414234 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Aramark Corporation, Inc., Daniel Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL HEYNS, Director, M.D.O.C., NICHOLAS SATA, CHRISTOPHER KING and others
USA v. Daron King
as 13-1669
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARON CHRISTOPHER KING
Tillman #324495 v. Huss et al
as 1:2013cv00297
Plaintiff:
Travis Tillman #324495
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Joseph Novak, Nanette Norwood and others
Movant:
Michael Gresham #272603
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annabel v. Heyns et al
as 2:2012cv13590
Plaintiff:
Robert Annabel
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, Tim Kipp, Morris and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
